<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Memory on Kusga</title>
		<link>https://kusga.com/tags/memory/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Memory on Kusga</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-gb</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 10:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://kusga.com/tags/memory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>LLM Memory in 2026: Why Most Benchmark Claims Don&#39;t Survive Scrutiny</title>
				<link>https://kusga.com/articles/llm-memory-in-2026-why-most-benchmark-claims-dont-survive-scrutiny/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 10:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://kusga.com/articles/llm-memory-in-2026-why-most-benchmark-claims-dont-survive-scrutiny/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;llm-memory-in-2026-why-most-benchmark-claims-dont-survive-scrutiny&#34;&gt;LLM Memory in 2026: Why Most Benchmark Claims Don&amp;rsquo;t Survive Scrutiny&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The race to build AI systems that &amp;ldquo;remember&amp;rdquo; their users has produced a&#xA;flurry of viral benchmark claims, several commercial products charging&#xA;between $19 and $249 per month, and a wave of confusion about what is&#xA;actually working. &lt;strong&gt;A widely shared open-source project recently hit&#xA;5,400 GitHub stars in under 24 hours on the strength of a 96.6% recall&#xA;score&lt;/strong&gt;, only to have a detailed methodological critique poke serious&#xA;holes in the claim within days.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
